我使用了新房子的永久木基础考虑。任何人对这些任何第一手资料。如何经得起时间的考验吗？防水？谢谢
我不知道为什么有人在他们的脑子会认真考虑永久木基础。
你所依赖的永久的整个房子的稳定是地面接触处理的木材。
考虑到白蚁和其他虫害可以通过处理过的木材直接食用，这确实是一个巨大的信念飞跃。
它发生的时间。
我会考虑什么，但对于任何家庭时间证明砌筑基础的基础。
甚至没有为10X低的成本....
你所依赖的永久的整个房子的稳定是地面接触处理的木材。
考虑到白蚁和其他虫害可以通过处理过的木材直接食用，这确实是一个巨大的信念飞跃。
它发生的时间。
我会考虑什么，但对于任何家庭时间证明砌筑基础的基础。
甚至没有为10X低的成本....
是的，我知道你有什么沙特，但这里是真实的故事。
永久伍德基金会（PWF）是很容易建立。由于简单，因为他们可能是，太多的建设者做出太多的错误。这不一定是他们的错。使用指南手册的设计手册是原因之一。这些手册是不完整的，只适用于非常有限种类的建筑结构。
由于公益金的建设始于1970年代初，有人故意把出现，以获得由家乡建设公共快速验收非常简单。在现实中，公益金的发起人是说对了一半。法定公益金是容易和简单的构建，但不能没有正确设计的计划，从而建立。这是真的不管我们建立。它是设计合理的方案，可以很容易和简单。否则，大家都在猜测，而建筑物的基础是没有地方去猜测。
如果没有一个正确的设计方案，建筑商可能不使用正确的钉图案或钉直径以支持存在于木质基础的各种连接的负载。这可能会导致失败，可能是主要问题和昂贵的维修。失败并不总是立即出现。有时候，他们回填过程中或直到几年后出现。指甲的缺陷是只有一个问题。有迹象表明，影响设计，并最终建设的最终结果很多变数。
试图简化设计，通过用表，图表，壁部分，和其他细节出版的手册制备。虽然这些尝试都令人钦佩，他们只能覆盖一些比较简单的情况下，再不是所有的时间，由于许多变量影响最终结果。这些手册中没有可以专门用作木材地基设计手册。在最好的情况，他们可以很好地指导建设给予了制造商的木材的基础是所有关于什么的想法。
这些手册导致了建筑商、建筑检查员以及业主的自满情绪。由于自满，每天都在犯很多错误。假设木材基础可以使用这些手册设计是错误的。工程师、建筑师和设计师对如何正确设计木质地基缺乏知识。当更多的人理解为什么PWF需要合适的设计，有更多有能力的设计师;地基的问题将会减少，PWF的地基将会被更好地认为是干燥舒适、成本更低的地下室的最佳解决方案。
这是最好的选择。
永久木Foundation.com
基础设计
罗斯科J.克拉克
还有更多！
！
永久伍德基金会系统承兑汇票
下列主要的管理机构和承保机构以及越来越多的州和地方建筑法规和贷款机构接受了永久性木材基础制度。注:本系统为woodbasement.com自定义设计。
建模代码
国家建筑规范1996年版。建筑人员及守则
管理员国际公司(博卡)
统一建筑规范1997年版。大厦的国际会议
官员（ICBO）
一户两户住宅代码1995版。委员会美国
建筑官员（CABO）
标准建筑规范1994年和1997年的版本。南方建筑规范
国际会议公司(SBCCI)
联邦机构
Verex担保有限公司
农民家庭管理局（FmHA）
退伍军人管理局（VA）
联邦住房贷款抵押公司（FHLMC）
美国储蓄协会联盟
联邦国民抵押贷款协会（FNMA）
贷款与抵押保险机构
Verex担保有限公司
抵押担保保险公司(MGIC)
联邦住房贷款抵押公司（FHLMC）
联邦国民抵押贷款协会（FNMA）
美国储蓄协会联盟
政府国民抵押贷款协会（GNMA）
保修和火灾保险机构
保险业监理处(ISO)
业主保证公司(HOW)
历史上
在1960年，基金会的想法用木头做的轻框架建筑显得有点牵强。我们不习惯的暴露在风雨中为具有足够的有效使用寿命用作基础材料，其中一个长寿命的前提木制品思维。然而，就在我们身边是用于已经持续了超过100年的建筑用木材的例子很多。木桩已经使用了一个多世纪来支持摩天大楼和桥梁，海上打桩的码头，码头，铁路枕木，桥梁木料;而在殖民时代处女木材被用作了基础院，教堂和其他结构。使用木材木材基金会是一个很好的证明想法的时代已经到来。1937年的一项研究中开始，由林产品实验室发起的，探索的住宅用木基础的效用。木焦油处理木材的基础建于威斯康星州麦迪逊市。（杂酚油用于住宅用途的今天不是一个可接受的防腐剂，但当时，这是最常用的防腐剂有良好的记录）。这栋楼已经得到良好的服务，日期和仍然被用作办公室的结构。 Approximately 15 years after it was built it was moved, foundation and all, to its present site. The move presented an excellent opportunity to observe the condition of the treated wood foundation after a period of time in actual use. No degrading because of decay or insect attack of the treated wood was noted. The foundation performed as expected and still is. In Canada in 1961, the National Home Builders Association, in cooperation with the Central Mortgage and Housing Corporation, built a crawl space type wood foundation, designated the Mark III; and in 1964 built a full basement wood foundation, designated the Mark IV. Both houses were built at the R.C.A.F. Station, Rockcliffe, Ottawa, Ontario. Both wood foundation walls were built with 2 x 4 studs with an outside skin of ½" T&G plywood. The wood in the Mark III foundation was pressure treated with 8 lbs. / cu. ft. with creosote, and the Mark IV with pentachlorophenol. The Mark III walls are on a footing of light concrete; and the Mark IV walls rest on a 2 x 8 footing which in turn rests directly of the bearing soil. The Mark IV has an untreated wood floor made of 2 x 8 floor joists nailed to studs and resting on a center bearing pony wall. These foundations are performing well and became the basis for the Permanent Wood Foundation System as we know it today. In 1965 the American Wood Preservers Institute, the National Forest Products Association (now the American Forest & Paper Association), and the Marketing and Economic Division of the United States Forest Service approached the National Association of Home Builders Research Foundation to do a feasibility study on the wood foundation concept. After extensive research and development, the All Weather Wood Foundation emerged. It is now known under a new name: The Permanent Wood Foundation System. Since 1969 specially treated wood (lumber and plywood) has been used commercially in the United States for wood foundations in light frame buildings such as homes, office buildings, churches, shopping centers, apartment buildings, and condominiums. That year, three houses were built in Lexington Park, Maryland by builder Jack Clifford. The foundation components were pre-manufactured by Kingsbury Homes, Division of Boise-Cascade. A block foundation was also constructed on a nearby site, using the same tradesmen, for comparison purposes. The idea was that if a true cost comparison was to made, the same tradesmen would have to be used. At the outset, one of the many advantages of the PWFS became apparent. The block foundation had been scheduled to be built first, but in March 1969 the site was too wet and muddy. Under these conditions it was easier to move lumber and plywood than to move blocks and concrete, so the PWF's were built first. It was also learned that rain did not stop work on the PWF's, but did cause some delays in completing the block foundation. In the same year Hurricane Camille drenched the area with 12" of rain in 24 hours. All three PWF's remained dry while the block basement and many other conventional basements in the area leaked or were flooded. The National Association of Home Builders Research Foundation continues to monitor these original PWF's houses for horizontal and vertical movement, leakage and humidity levels, and any evidence of decay or insect attack. To date no problems have been found in these original wood foundations. In 1971 the first PWF was built in Ohio for the Columbus Parade of Homes at Reynoldsburg, Ohio. The house was a tri-level and was built by Ernest G. Fritschie Company. At the same time Fritschie built a conventional house with a block foundation. It began 3 ½ days before the PWF, but both foundations were completed the same afternoon. If both had started at the same time, by the time the block foundation had been completed, the PWF house could have been completely framed. In 1973 the first house in Michigan was built with a PWF in Leroy Township, Calhoun County by Brooks Realty. This was a ranch "double-wide" pre-manufactured home which was craned onto the PWF. This house was the only one in the subdivision with a full basement. It was located between a lake and a swamp with a very high water table. It had a 7' backfill. This home has been occupied since 1973 and has never had moisture problems even though it was originally built about 18" below the water table. The lower level basement area is used as a dry comfortable living space. In this case it doubled the livable portion of the home without adding to its cost. With its adopted aggregate drainage system, high water tables and other horrible site conditions need not be a deterrent to the successful installation of a PWF. 1980 Roscoe Clark of PWF, Inc. Flint, MI started designing foundations for builders and home owners for a low cost fee. This custom design service made the wood foundation easy to install.. Now you can have your next wood foundation custom designed and get training on how to install it. (PWF, Inc. can be contacted for more design information.)pwfs.com Hundreds of thousands of wood foundations have been built in The United States, and when Canada is included, they number more than a million. Advantages - The advantages of the PWF are numerous. Some of them are listed as follows: A. Dry & Comfortable - PWF's create a completely dry comfortable living space below finished grade with no musty odors or smells. The basement is just like any room in the home above grade. B. More Area in Basement - The walls are generally thinner with existing stud spaces ready for insulation, and with no need to add furring and losing area in the basement. Sometimes the area saved, if it could be concentrated in one spot would equal the size of a bathroom or even an extra small bedroom. C. Warmer & More Energy Efficient - Because of the existing stud spaces for insulation and because wood itself adds insulation value, the PWF saves heat loss and conserves energy, lowering heating and cooling costs. By contrast conventional foundations are good conductors of heat. D. Strength & Stability - It is a common misconception that the kind of material determines the strength of the structure. Strength is determined by engineering and PWF's are engineered, and are as strong as any other material used for foundations. Wood foundations are engineered to as strong are they need to be. From a stability standpoint they are superior. Each wall of a PWF is like a truss (a stressed skin a plywood on a series of studs and plates). Unforecast weak spots in the bearing soil are simply bridged with no settling or cracking. Concrete does not bridge weak spots well.
如果我能帮忙的话，请让我来谢谢
罗斯科
基础设计
密歇根州弗林特
该是最好的系统。
罗斯科Ĵ克拉克
永久伍德基金会（PWF）是很容易建立。由于简单，因为他们可能是，太多的建设者做出太多的错误。这不一定是他们的错。使用指南手册的设计手册是原因之一。这些手册是不完整的，只适用于非常有限种类的建筑结构。
由于公益金的建设始于1970年代初，有人故意把出现，以获得由家乡建设公共快速验收非常简单。在现实中，公益金的发起人是说对了一半。法定公益金是容易和简单的构建，但不能没有正确设计的计划，从而建立。这是真的不管我们建立。它是设计合理的方案，可以很容易和简单。否则，大家都在猜测，而建筑物的基础是没有地方去猜测。
如果没有一个正确的设计方案，建筑商可能不使用正确的钉图案或钉直径以支持存在于木质基础的各种连接的负载。这可能会导致失败，可能是主要问题和昂贵的维修。失败并不总是立即出现。有时候，他们回填过程中或直到几年后出现。指甲的缺陷是只有一个问题。有迹象表明，影响设计，并最终建设的最终结果很多变数。
试图简化设计，通过用表，图表，壁部分，和其他细节出版的手册制备。虽然这些尝试都令人钦佩，他们只能覆盖一些比较简单的情况下，再不是所有的时间，由于许多变量影响最终结果。这些手册中没有可以专门用作木材地基设计手册。在最好的情况，他们可以很好地指导建设给予了制造商的木材的基础是所有关于什么的想法。
这些手册导致了建筑商、建筑检查员以及业主的自满情绪。由于自满，每天都在犯很多错误。假设木材基础可以使用这些手册设计是错误的。工程师、建筑师和设计师对如何正确设计木质地基缺乏知识。当更多的人理解为什么PWF需要合适的设计，有更多有能力的设计师;地基的问题将会减少，PWF的地基将会被更好地认为是干燥舒适、成本更低的地下室的最佳解决方案。
这是最好的选择。
永久木Foundation.com
基础设计
罗斯科J.克拉克
还有更多！
！
永久伍德基金会系统承兑汇票
下列主要的管理机构和承保机构以及越来越多的州和地方建筑法规和贷款机构接受了永久性木材基础制度。注:本系统为woodbasement.com自定义设计。
建模代码
国家建筑规范1996年版。建筑人员及守则
管理员国际公司(博卡)
统一建筑规范1997年版。大厦的国际会议
官员（ICBO）
一户两户住宅代码1995版。委员会美国
建筑官员（CABO）
标准建筑规范1994年和1997年的版本。南方建筑规范
国际会议公司(SBCCI)
联邦机构
Verex担保有限公司
农民家庭管理局（FmHA）
退伍军人管理局（VA）
联邦住房贷款抵押公司（FHLMC）
美国储蓄协会联盟
联邦国民抵押贷款协会（FNMA）
贷款与抵押保险机构
Verex担保有限公司
抵押担保保险公司(MGIC)
联邦住房贷款抵押公司（FHLMC）
联邦国民抵押贷款协会（FNMA）
美国储蓄协会联盟
政府国民抵押贷款协会（GNMA）
保修和火灾保险机构
保险业监理处(ISO)
业主保证公司(HOW)
历史上
在1960年，基金会的想法用木头做的轻框架建筑显得有点牵强。我们不习惯的暴露在风雨中为具有足够的有效使用寿命用作基础材料，其中一个长寿命的前提木制品思维。然而，就在我们身边是用于已经持续了超过100年的建筑用木材的例子很多。木桩已经使用了一个多世纪来支持摩天大楼和桥梁，海上打桩的码头，码头，铁路枕木，桥梁木料;而在殖民时代处女木材被用作了基础院，教堂和其他结构。使用木材木材基金会是一个很好的证明想法的时代已经到来。1937年的一项研究中开始，由林产品实验室发起的，探索的住宅用木基础的效用。木焦油处理木材的基础建于威斯康星州麦迪逊市。（杂酚油用于住宅用途的今天不是一个可接受的防腐剂，但当时，这是最常用的防腐剂有良好的记录）。这栋楼已经得到良好的服务，日期和仍然被用作办公室的结构。 Approximately 15 years after it was built it was moved, foundation and all, to its present site. The move presented an excellent opportunity to observe the condition of the treated wood foundation after a period of time in actual use. No degrading because of decay or insect attack of the treated wood was noted. The foundation performed as expected and still is. In Canada in 1961, the National Home Builders Association, in cooperation with the Central Mortgage and Housing Corporation, built a crawl space type wood foundation, designated the Mark III; and in 1964 built a full basement wood foundation, designated the Mark IV. Both houses were built at the R.C.A.F. Station, Rockcliffe, Ottawa, Ontario. Both wood foundation walls were built with 2 x 4 studs with an outside skin of ½" T&G plywood. The wood in the Mark III foundation was pressure treated with 8 lbs. / cu. ft. with creosote, and the Mark IV with pentachlorophenol. The Mark III walls are on a footing of light concrete; and the Mark IV walls rest on a 2 x 8 footing which in turn rests directly of the bearing soil. The Mark IV has an untreated wood floor made of 2 x 8 floor joists nailed to studs and resting on a center bearing pony wall. These foundations are performing well and became the basis for the Permanent Wood Foundation System as we know it today. In 1965 the American Wood Preservers Institute, the National Forest Products Association (now the American Forest & Paper Association), and the Marketing and Economic Division of the United States Forest Service approached the National Association of Home Builders Research Foundation to do a feasibility study on the wood foundation concept. After extensive research and development, the All Weather Wood Foundation emerged. It is now known under a new name: The Permanent Wood Foundation System. Since 1969 specially treated wood (lumber and plywood) has been used commercially in the United States for wood foundations in light frame buildings such as homes, office buildings, churches, shopping centers, apartment buildings, and condominiums. That year, three houses were built in Lexington Park, Maryland by builder Jack Clifford. The foundation components were pre-manufactured by Kingsbury Homes, Division of Boise-Cascade. A block foundation was also constructed on a nearby site, using the same tradesmen, for comparison purposes. The idea was that if a true cost comparison was to made, the same tradesmen would have to be used. At the outset, one of the many advantages of the PWFS became apparent. The block foundation had been scheduled to be built first, but in March 1969 the site was too wet and muddy. Under these conditions it was easier to move lumber and plywood than to move blocks and concrete, so the PWF's were built first. It was also learned that rain did not stop work on the PWF's, but did cause some delays in completing the block foundation. In the same year Hurricane Camille drenched the area with 12" of rain in 24 hours. All three PWF's remained dry while the block basement and many other conventional basements in the area leaked or were flooded. The National Association of Home Builders Research Foundation continues to monitor these original PWF's houses for horizontal and vertical movement, leakage and humidity levels, and any evidence of decay or insect attack. To date no problems have been found in these original wood foundations. In 1971 the first PWF was built in Ohio for the Columbus Parade of Homes at Reynoldsburg, Ohio. The house was a tri-level and was built by Ernest G. Fritschie Company. At the same time Fritschie built a conventional house with a block foundation. It began 3 ½ days before the PWF, but both foundations were completed the same afternoon. If both had started at the same time, by the time the block foundation had been completed, the PWF house could have been completely framed. In 1973 the first house in Michigan was built with a PWF in Leroy Township, Calhoun County by Brooks Realty. This was a ranch "double-wide" pre-manufactured home which was craned onto the PWF. This house was the only one in the subdivision with a full basement. It was located between a lake and a swamp with a very high water table. It had a 7' backfill. This home has been occupied since 1973 and has never had moisture problems even though it was originally built about 18" below the water table. The lower level basement area is used as a dry comfortable living space. In this case it doubled the livable portion of the home without adding to its cost. With its adopted aggregate drainage system, high water tables and other horrible site conditions need not be a deterrent to the successful installation of a PWF. 1980 Roscoe Clark of PWF, Inc. Flint, MI started designing foundations for builders and home owners for a low cost fee. This custom design service made the wood foundation easy to install.. Now you can have your next wood foundation custom designed and get training on how to install it. (PWF, Inc. can be contacted for more design information.)pwfs.com Hundreds of thousands of wood foundations have been built in The United States, and when Canada is included, they number more than a million. Advantages - The advantages of the PWF are numerous. Some of them are listed as follows: A. Dry & Comfortable - PWF's create a completely dry comfortable living space below finished grade with no musty odors or smells. The basement is just like any room in the home above grade. B. More Area in Basement - The walls are generally thinner with existing stud spaces ready for insulation, and with no need to add furring and losing area in the basement. Sometimes the area saved, if it could be concentrated in one spot would equal the size of a bathroom or even an extra small bedroom. C. Warmer & More Energy Efficient - Because of the existing stud spaces for insulation and because wood itself adds insulation value, the PWF saves heat loss and conserves energy, lowering heating and cooling costs. By contrast conventional foundations are good conductors of heat. D. Strength & Stability - It is a common misconception that the kind of material determines the strength of the structure. Strength is determined by engineering and PWF's are engineered, and are as strong as any other material used for foundations. Wood foundations are engineered to as strong are they need to be. From a stability standpoint they are superior. Each wall of a PWF is like a truss (a stressed skin a plywood on a series of studs and plates). Unforecast weak spots in the bearing soil are simply bridged with no settling or cracking. Concrete does not bridge weak spots well.
如果我能帮忙的话，请让我来谢谢
罗斯科
基础设计
密歇根州弗林特
该是最好的系统。
罗斯科Ĵ克拉克
迟来的感谢您的意见和信息，罗斯科。
我已经检查木材的基础，为过去15年和从来没有发现一个是在非常大的麻烦。我希望我能说的砖石和混凝土一样。
这里的大多数反对者说的都是他们不知道的事情。这就是无知的定义。
我还发现，建筑商在开发良好的排水系统方面做得非常出色。在排水系统恶化的地方，大部分的履带仍然是干的。这只能是在周边防水和次表面排水是最佳安装。
我发现主要的退化是暴露在土壤和房屋地板系统之间的牺牲面板，是退化的。我认为这是可以防止的涂层和维护与渗透油密封。今天，有一些矿物涂层面板，将有更好的寿命和外观。
木质地基的设计理念是一个有效且明智的想法。它需要比一般的工艺更好，这主要说明了如何可怕的平均是!
我刚刚视察了家里用“木”地下室在屋顶和地表水的维护一直是可怕多年。在完成地下室看起来涂漆橡木护壁板是相同的年龄都在家里休息和它看起来质朴。任何熟悉橡树知道它变回用很少利湿。显然，地下系统已经做了出色的工作。我打算让他们不要工作难更长的时间后，我的建议得到采纳。
最好的祝愿,
马克
我已经检查木材的基础，为过去15年和从来没有发现一个是在非常大的麻烦。我希望我能说的砖石和混凝土一样。
这里的大多数反对者说的都是他们不知道的事情。这就是无知的定义。
我还发现，建筑商在开发良好的排水系统方面做得非常出色。在排水系统恶化的地方，大部分的履带仍然是干的。这只能是在周边防水和次表面排水是最佳安装。
我发现主要的退化是暴露在土壤和房屋地板系统之间的牺牲面板，是退化的。我认为这是可以防止的涂层和维护与渗透油密封。今天，有一些矿物涂层面板，将有更好的寿命和外观。
木质地基的设计理念是一个有效且明智的想法。它需要比一般的工艺更好，这主要说明了如何可怕的平均是!
我刚刚视察了家里用“木”地下室在屋顶和地表水的维护一直是可怕多年。在完成地下室看起来涂漆橡木护壁板是相同的年龄都在家里休息和它看起来质朴。任何熟悉橡树知道它变回用很少利湿。显然，地下系统已经做了出色的工作。我打算让他们不要工作难更长的时间后，我的建议得到采纳。
最好的祝愿,
马克
在过去的25年里，我已经建造了6到7个PWF地基。我开始做是因为我花了太多的时间来校正(摆正、平方)浇筑的混凝土地基。我在我最近建造的第一个(1988年)上增加了一个部分，并沿着原来房子的一半挖出了地基。它的状况非常好，就像25年前我安装地基一样。地基的PWF系统是房屋的明智选择。好处是无穷的。
26年前，我在我的明尼苏达州湖滨小屋建了一个日光房(三面在地下，一面开敞建在斜坡上)。在阅读了所有关于水损害的博客和帖子后，我完全挖出了回填。它是绝对干燥和良好的形状。然后再次防水和回填。我不明白为什么这个地下室不能用几百年。
罗斯科Clark.here。
如果你有关于这个系统的任何问题，随时打电话给我，我会告诉你更多。这个基础系统是最好的选择。
它将执行所有其他类型的。基础在一切分生，因为它是设计来。
我可以向您发送电子邮件有关wood.foudation系统穆尔信息。
我email.is woodbasement@comcast.net
打电话给我810 429-2418随时随地。
我不仅在国内，也在许多州培训建筑检查员。
我的第一个oundation墙back.in 20世纪80年代，我有设计更是1000个定制的基础设计。
这system.works每次。
它must.be设计，性能的材料使用，对PDF格式设计正确的安装基地。
永久性木基是最好的选择。
谢谢
基金会设计师罗斯科·克拉克
我做基础检查，如果你需要视觉信息。
如果你有关于这个系统的任何问题，随时打电话给我，我会告诉你更多。这个基础系统是最好的选择。
它将执行所有其他类型的。基础在一切分生，因为它是设计来。
我可以向您发送电子邮件有关wood.foudation系统穆尔信息。
我email.is woodbasement@comcast.net
打电话给我810 429-2418随时随地。
我不仅在国内，也在许多州培训建筑检查员。
我的第一个oundation墙back.in 20世纪80年代，我有设计更是1000个定制的基础设计。
这system.works每次。
它must.be设计，性能的材料使用，对PDF格式设计正确的安装基地。
永久性木基是最好的选择。
谢谢
基金会设计师罗斯科·克拉克
我做基础检查，如果你需要视觉信息。
我23年前建立了一个PWF基础在加拿大多伦多北部。我看到和经历在艾伯塔省埃德蒙顿家庭修建的。构建呼吁液下泵代码。它从来没有在所有这些年的历程上。地下室大于混凝土块或倾基础加热器和烘干机。只有一个在地面轻微裂缝，长度为6脚。有带门移对准了没有问题。这房子是2880平方英尺的地面上和4300包括地下室。
我认为关键是场地准备和基础设计。洗石，不锈钢钉，密封外墙以及水气屏障，洗石3英尺高的基础墙和精细的建筑工砂平衡的方式上升。我选择在地面上建造，每隔一段固定的排水管道，地板下是聚苯乙烯泡沫塑料，整个内部周边有6英尺的聚苯乙烯泡沫塑料隔热层，下台阶的地基部分也有聚苯乙烯泡沫塑料隔热层。地下室的墙壁建造了9英尺高，以容纳8英尺高的天花板。墙壁是2x8结构，允许更高的绝缘值。如果我没记错的话是R36。考虑到水电费的增加，它已经在成本和舒适度上为自己买单了。
如果我再建一次，除了PWF，我不会考虑其他任何东西，并确保我找到了一个有经验的建设者来建造这种类型的基础。如果处理得当，就没有比这更好的了。
我认为关键是场地准备和基础设计。洗石，不锈钢钉，密封外墙以及水气屏障，洗石3英尺高的基础墙和精细的建筑工砂平衡的方式上升。我选择在地面上建造，每隔一段固定的排水管道，地板下是聚苯乙烯泡沫塑料，整个内部周边有6英尺的聚苯乙烯泡沫塑料隔热层，下台阶的地基部分也有聚苯乙烯泡沫塑料隔热层。地下室的墙壁建造了9英尺高，以容纳8英尺高的天花板。墙壁是2x8结构，允许更高的绝缘值。如果我没记错的话是R36。考虑到水电费的增加，它已经在成本和舒适度上为自己买单了。
如果我再建一次，除了PWF，我不会考虑其他任何东西，并确保我找到了一个有经验的建设者来建造这种类型的基础。如果处理得当，就没有比这更好的了。
我已经建成了一批具有永久木工程，包括我自己在1985年。然而房屋的，并非所有的网站都适合木材基础。一个好的网站应该有良好的排水和粘土和任何积水免费。如果你有这样一个网站，那么木材的基础可以是一个很好的选择，他们是干燥和温暖，那么块或正确的时候做混凝土地基。我建立在改性混凝土的基础或合并压实与基础排水石材，保温和防潮层砖我所有的木质基础。做好你的功课，并确保你有处理过的木材的螺栓尺寸，螺栓间距，和胶合板厚度和适当的等级可以承载负荷，他们将要承受。目前已在嵌缝料很多改进，密封产品，与基础墙面材料在过去的30年，所以不用猜对什么是最好的，但做一些研究。如果您正在构建自己的家，这是不熟悉的领域为您找到一个专家，可以帮助你。
我正在考虑在我家的添加法定公益金。基于我已经能够在阅读时，它看起来这是一个实用，高效的系统。我关心的是如何把它绑定到现有结构，并具有领带点是滴水不漏。我在中央纽约地区这里的土壤应该是伟大的，因为它有很多沙子和石头，并且已经适合于排水良好。我现在的地下室是传统的成块和迫击炮及非常干燥。我也打算在我家后院将建设一个生产车间，并想用它作为法定公益金一个测试项目。为了遵守当地法规，我必须保持相当低的最大顶高。不超过12英尺从职的高峰期。为了让天花板的高度我想，我要下去2 - 3脚与获得我的天花板高度的方式。我的目的是使用法定公益金像膝盖墙会以上等级，然后建立与最重要的是传统的木材。 What's your thoughts?
